It may look as if the U.S. Equestrian Federation has dumbed down the finals of the Platinum Performance Show Jumping Talent Search by lowering the fences, but those involved in making the decision say it ainโ€™t so.

The impetus for the federationโ€™s jumping sport committee to change the fence height from 1.20 meters to 1.15 meters for the 2019 finals was the fact that entries in the East Coast finals, which always has more competitors than the West Coast version, were down last year to a mere 33 starters, from 52 in 2017.

Run over two days, with a flat phase, gymnastics segment, a course of jumps and the Final Four that involves switching horses, the Talent Search is the longest and most demanding of the fall equitation finals. The class is designed to discover riders who have the ability to someday represent the U.S. internationally, the way previous winners such as McLain Ward, Richard Spooner and Charlie Jayne have done.

According to the USEF, the Talent Search program โ€œplays an important role in developing jumping athletes by encouraging Junior and Young Riders to develop the skills that lay the groundwork for future international success.โ€

Subscribe to the Horse Sport newsletter and get an exclusive bonus digital edition!
Subscribe to the Horse Sport newsletter and get an exclusive bonus digital edition!

We'll send you our regular newsletter and include you in our monthly giveaways. PLUS, you'll receive our exclusive Rider Fitness digital edition with 15 exercises for more effective riding.

Horse Sport Enews

With that in mind, lowering the fence height may seem โ€œcounter-intuitive on many levels,โ€ acknowledged Lizzy Chesson, the USEFโ€™s managing director of show jumping. But she explained the class is โ€œreally not meant to be a horse contest, itโ€™s supposed to be a riding contest.โ€

She added, โ€œI donโ€™t think itโ€™s a dumbing down thing, I think itโ€™s being realistic about where this sits within the pathway, and there are many other opportunities in the pathway on the jumping side of life.

โ€œThis is one element of it. Before this, we didnโ€™t have these youth Nationsโ€™ Cups available in this country for people to have these steppingstones. This is realizing and adjusting within the opportunities that we have now. The format is still very special and tests more than what the other finals do.โ€

With so many big show jumping classes available now, using horses who can handle 1.20 for the finals โ€œwas not necessarily on the highest priority list. The height shouldnโ€™t be the precluding factor for someone to be able to get into the finals.โ€ The idea, she said, is โ€œto focus on the riding and not necessarily on the horsepower.โ€

The new specs were formulated by the Talent Search Task Force after โ€œfeedback from key constituents.โ€

โ€œWe originally thought when we put it (the finals) at 1.20 meters it would raise the level, but in doing that, we had unintended consequences,โ€ said Olympic medalist Beezie Madden, a member of the task force.

โ€œWe had some good riders who were left out because they didnโ€™t have the means to have a horse for it. People felt they didnโ€™t have a horse capable of doing 1.20 meters, so a lot of people didnโ€™t even try to qualify,โ€ she noted.

The pipeline seems healthy to her.

โ€œWe have more young kids capable of doing championships and Nationsโ€™ Cups,โ€ she continued, noting there were riders in the under-25 range who did 5-star Nationsโ€™ Cups last year.

โ€œI think weโ€™re preparing them better than we have than in the pastโ€ฆwe have so many jumper divisions.โ€

The concept of 1.20 meter fences โ€œwas an experiment,โ€ said Lizzy.

โ€œHowever, โ€œwe realized it left a lot of people not being able to participate because of horse power and that wasnโ€™t the aim of it. We want to see the talent,โ€ Lizzy commented.

A case in point: Only one of the top four in the 2018 finals used their own horse; the other three finalists leased or borrowed mounts capable of handling the classโ€™s demands.

โ€œI am very sensitive to being able to see talent without having to have the massive horse power behind it,โ€ Lizzy said. โ€œAt that stage in an athleteโ€™s career, I think we need to be cognizant of that.โ€

Another change for this yearโ€™s finals will permit judges to put a 0.90-meter trot jump at the beginning of the gymnastics phase. A few years ago, the recommendation was that no trot fences would be allowed in the gymnastics.

Trainer Stacia Madden, whose students have won the finals many times, noted after the 2018 East Coast finals that the gymnastics had โ€œhistorically been kind of a sticky wicket,โ€ saying that segment often relied on gimmicks.

However, some of the judges โ€œreally missed having the option of using a trot fence to test in the gymnastics,โ€ Lizzy noted.

I thought part of the reason for a trot fence was to have it woven into the course. Thatโ€™s the way it often is done in the ASPCA Maclay finals, run over 1.10-meter fences with horses who usually are equitation specialists. It is a test to see if the rider could slow the horse down to take the obstacle, then resume the rest of the gymnastics at a canter. It speaks to adjustability and responsiveness, in my view.

Lizzy responded, โ€œThe counter-argument to that is that many of these (Talent Search) horses are competition horses and they know theyโ€™re competing and they donโ€™t trot in the middle of a competition.โ€ Those doing the specs for the Talent Search โ€œdidnโ€™t want it to be about the horse being unsettled because theyโ€™re used to cantering throughout the whole thing.โ€

I was skeptical, but Lizzy said, โ€œSome of our top people believe this, so I have to believe it. These jumping horses wonโ€™t trot in the middle of a course. Even if youโ€™re the best rider in the world, you canโ€™t get them to trot.โ€

~ Nancy Jaffer