Growing research and ethograms detailing pain signs in horses are shedding light on what has long been silent suffering, but the normalization of pain has been so prevalent in the horse industry it remains largely misunderstood. Despite several studies over the past decade confirming specific facial expressions and behaviours that commonly indicate horses in pain, our culture is saturated by centuries of art romanticizing those very qualities: angled eyes, gaping mouths, hyperflexed necks, and so on. These and other pain signs are so normalized that even when communicated with warning signs and undesirable behaviours (pinned ears, swishing tail, pawing, etc), they’re often either overlooked or the horse is blamed for having a ‘bad attitude’.

While anthropomorphizing has had its place in helping to bridge a deeper compassion between horse and human, so too has it contributed to tropes of horses scheming to get out of work by faking lameness, plotting harm against handlers (ex: when they see the saddle coming), and the like. It’s an unfortunate yet commonplace punchline to write off mares exhibiting signs of discomfort or agitation as being “mare-ish” or dismiss a certain horse as always being grumpy. These tropes are reaffirmed especially if the horse is chestnut à la the “fiery redhead” stigma. However, without a well-developed frontal lobe, horses cannot plot or scheme or fake injury; they are not typically grumpy animals; and there’s no scientific evidence to support the idea that a horse’s colour affects their behaviour. As such, these sorts of behaviours warrant investigation.

When Good Horses Misbehave

Sudden or gradual changes in behaviour are often the first sign something is amiss or uncomfortable for the horse, even as subtle as tail swishing or head tossing. The horse may be irritable to groom or tack, refuse to stand still at the mounting block, start rushing or refusing to move, and escalate as far as kicking out, bucking, or rearing.

Advertisement

A 2013 study evaluating 161 horses at 17 different equestrian centres around France found that caretakers of riding school horses grossly underestimated (by 37-85%) how many of their horses suffered from back pain. The researchers noted distinct differences between riding centres. Some had only a few horses with back pain, while in other stables nearly all the horses had pain. The stables with the lowest percentages of horses in pain were where caretakers actually overestimated the percentage. Conversely, the highest percentages of horses in pain came from stables where caretakers assumed the horses were mostly fine. Overall, nearly 50% of all horses evaluated suffered from back pain.