You would have to have been born yesterday (or at least more recently than the last Olympics) to be alarmed by the myriad of articles appearing in Toronto newspapers regarding cost overruns and behind-schedule venue completions for this summer’s Pan American Games. It’s a familiar tune: as a major Games approaches, local media have a field day enumerating all the ways in which this Games will turn out to be a disaster. And then, when the opening ceremonies ultimately take place on schedule, miraculously there are roofs on all the buildings and the Games are pulled off after all.

Equestrian sports have not been spared the media’s hairy eyeball as the date of the 2015 Pan Am Games approaches. In June 2014, the Caledon Enterprise, a newspaper published in the city where the TO2015 equestrian events will take place, published an opinionated story about a $1.1 million travel subsidy for horses traveling to the Pan Am Games. The article’s author, Matthew Strader, liberally quoted an ex-MPP named Rod Jackson (Barrie), a man who holds a dim view of the travel subsidy. When the article came out, it raised eyebrows within the Canadian equestrian community. The first thought that came to many minds was how far a million dollars would go toward helping the Canadian Equestrian Team, rather than helping its rivals get to Toronto.

But is a travel subsidy really such an abominable idea? The goal of the funding is to guarantee the strongest and most international field possible, with coveted Olympic classifications being awarded to true champions of the Americas. It would seem that the Toronto media and politicians who have expressed shock and dismay are turning the proverbial mole hill into something much bigger.

Advertisement